Los Algodones, Baja California; Mexico

This is not the End of the World, but you can see it from here!



Saturday, March 23, 2013

Tijuana Friendship Park Closing budget woes

 
Friendship Park at the U.S.-Mexico border will be closing in two weeks because of sequester cuts.

The Border Patrol says they have been forced to downsize their budget, which means they will need to close the park.

The park draws big crowds from the U.S. and Mexico, where people chat through a chain-link fence separating Imperial Beach and Tijuana.

Opponents to the closure say the park is a necessary part of the relationship between the Mexican and American border.

“You see families really typical at Friendship Park,” said James Brown with Friendship Park Coalition. “They have families come from many days bus ride in Mexico and even Central America, to visit relatives in the U.S. and the meeting place is Friendship Park.”

Brown said they have worked with the Border Patrol to keep budget low, only opening park on the weekend for a couple hours a day which only requires one border agent.

Customs and Border Patrol issued the following statement to NBC 7 San Diego:
"The automatic budget reductions must be applied to virtually every program, project, and activity that DHS has and will negatively affect the mission readiness and capabilities of the men and women on our front lines.”

The Friendship Park Coalition plans to meet with Border Patrol in the coming weeks to negotiate keeping the park open and supporters said they

200 deportees daily to Tijuana, 60 gangs ties

Are U.S. and Mexican deportation and reintegration policies fomenting delinquency in Tijuana? According to a prominent academic researcher and immigrant rights activist, the answer is yes. Victor Clark Alfaro, director of Tijuana’s Binational Center for Human Rights, told the local press that the deportation of gang-affiliated individuals who are left on their own in the Mexican border city with no resources or legitimate employment options is exacerbating a serious problem of drug abuse and delinquency.

Of an average of 200 deportees who arrive daily to Tijuana, Clark Alfaro estimated that at least 30 percent of them have ties with southern California gangs including Mara Salvatrucha, M-18, M-13, Florence, and the Mexican Mafia. After their arrival in Tijuana, the deportees don’t find job opportunities and confront discrimination from the local society because of their dress, style and tattoos, Clark Alfaro contended.

The border anthropologist said the lack of papers on the U.S. side of the border is likewise a problem on the Mexican side, where it is difficult to obtain the birth certificates and federal voter cards which are routinely used for identification in Mexico. Undocumented individuals are then harassed and detained by Tijuana municipal police officers, Clark Alfaro asserted.

He said the desperate situation of the deportees coupled with the cross-border criminal backgrounds of many make them ideal recruits for organized crime. Employed as look-outs, meth cooks, street dealers and hit men, deportees wind up constituting the lower base of the pyramid of organized crime in Tijuana, Clark Alfaro added.

While the high-profile violence between warring drug gangs that shattered Tijuana a few years back has largely receded into the background, local drug consumption and the violence associated with it have not gone away. Regularly, the press reports on the detentions of street dealers, small-scale drug confiscations and killings said to be connected to the lower rung of the underworld.

This week, for example, the Baja California attorney general’s office told the media it was investigating four homicides committed in recent days. In one case, two men were found beaten and strangled in a home. In another case, Roberto Alejandro Cortes Chorta, 25, was arrested and accused of killing his friend, 26-year-old Veronica Palacios Espinoza, and then stuffing her body in a suitcase with the aid of his mother, after the young couple consumed drugs and argued.

In a third instance, 21-year-old Jessica Michele Munoz was found strangled inside a Ford Explorer with a dose of crystal meth on a breast. Reportedly, Munoz was earlier linked to small-time drug dealing. On Wednesday, March 20, 22-year-old Margarita Martinez Michel became the third woman murdered in Tijuana in a week when she was shot to death in front of her home, in a crime also linked to street dealing.

On March 19, Tijuana municipal Baja California state police authorities reported detaining 18 street dealers and confiscating small amounts of meth, heroin, cocaine and marijuana. Separately, two other men were arrested for allegedly preparing a car with California license plates with a marijuana shipment.

In an analysis published last year, Clark Alfaro, who teaches at San Diego State University, wrote that the presumed end of the Tijuana drug war and the decline in murder statistics, which registered more than 2,300 homicides during the peak years of violence between 2008 and 2010 according to the scholar-activist, has not ended insecurity but largely confined it to the working-class neighborhoods of the city and among the lower classes. A similar pattern is currently playing out in Ciudad Juarez, Acapulco and other places.

Clark Alfaro described two Tijuanas: “the modern city. ” a place where the financial and political elite reside, and the rest of the city where poor zones punctuated with islands of walled-off subdivisions proliferate.

As order has been restored for the upper echelons of society, social disintegration has taken hold on the lower end, characterized by rising drug addiction, especially to meth, and the briskness of an illicit market that easily withstands police and military seizures, according to Clark Alfaro. In this schema, the business of murder is systematic but tucked away from the larger society and done in a non-scandalous way.

Wrote the border analyst:

“The murdered, on average one a day, now are not people murdered in abhorrent ways: decapitated, dismembered or incinerated. Rather, they are shot to death…the daily murder victims are now irrelevant persons in the structure of delinquency, since according to the authorities, 80 percent of them were people linked to the sale of drugs on the streets of the other Tijuana, not the modern part of the city,”.

In his more recent comments to the Tijuana press, Clark Alfaro said not enough attention was being paid to the issue of local drug dealing/consumption. He urged giving alternatives to deportees but feared public policy was headed in the wrong direction. “All indications are that a police solution is desired for a problem that requires a humanitarian one,” Clark Alfaro contended.

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Aerospace Field Growing in Mexico

One of the country´s top candidates to support this growth is Baja California’s aerospace cluster, comprised by over 52 companies that represent 25% of Mexico´s industry. Currently the state is preparing to overtake other aerospace destinations on talent availability; three of its most prestigious universities have implemented specialized training programs for the aerospace sector developing a large base of engineering talent, meeting industry requirements and aligned with the national industry forecast.
The State University of Baja California or UABC, an iconic educational institution in the state, launched five years ago The Center for Aerospace and Engineering Technology. Today, its first class of 14 engineers will be graduating on December 2013, besides the number of enrolled students on the Aerospace Engineering program has greatly increased. The engineering campus has one of the best equipped composites laboratories, built in collaboration with Honeywell Aerospace. One of the Center’s recent achievements is the launching of an experimental rocket made by students in collaboration with experts of San Jose State University and supervised by NASA.
Cetys Universidad, an Institution certified by The Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC), offers an engineering program focused on Aerospace and a Master’s in Aerospace Engineering. Annually over 50 students enroll in the program, and 14 of them graduate as Aerospace Engineers. This university is currently working on building a prototyping lab for scale aircraft and automotive modeling, with that purpose it is developing three research teams integrated by students, teachers and local industry engineers.
At the technical level,Tijuana Technological University (UTT as its acronym in Spanish) has a strong linkage program with aerospace companies. The institution developed mechatronics engineering program as well as two professional technician licenses in mechatronics and aerospace harness manufacturing, customized to the local industry needs. Around 100 students enroll yearly in the engineering program and over 300 in both aerospace technical careers, supplying the industry with 36 engineers and over 60 licensed technicians in aerospace harnessing, precision machining and mechatronics each year.
In addition UTT recently inaugurated its $400 thousand dollar, Product Lifecycle Management Lab, the forth in Mexico. This lab includes cutting-edge software that allows controlling the product manufacturing process virtually, from its conception to industrial design, testing, manufacturing, delivery to the customer, and after-service. This lab will enable the companies to simulate a manufacturing process, reducing costs and mistakes; and will train students on the use of advanced simulation and design software facilitating their entry in engineering fields such as Industrial Design, Mechatronics, and Process Automation among others.
The Baja California Aerospace Cluster is joining efforts with local educational institutions and the State Government; working on early detection of engineering skills in students of basic and secondary levels of education, and integrate them to a scholarship program named “Robotics & Space Advance Program for BC Kids”. The cluster has detected 260 candidates for the program: children of low income families and highly skilled in mathematics and exact sciences that also show great ability on problem solving, logic, analytics, critical reasoning and creativity skills.
The first stage of the program will cover a robotics course for 32 children, the “Wibots Robotics” course seeks to introduce children to the engineering field, with the purpose of awakening an early interest for science and technology.
Tijuana not only offers to the global industry a ready supply of aerospace related professionals, the city also holds a steady labor pool of over 12,500 trained and experienced employees, that is growing at 6% annually.
Tijuana´s education linkage committee will be supporting the State of Baja California efforts in promoting the local aerospace industry during the fourth edition of Baja´s Aerospace forum on August 29, with bus tours one day prior to the event. For more information visit http://www.bajaaerospaceshow.com
About Tijuana EDC: Nonprofit corporation dedicated to help companies to establish successful manufacturing operations in Mexico and to take advantage of business opportunities of vertical integration introducing qualified Mexican suppliers and accessing new markets. For more information on how to take advantage of these opportunities contact the Tijuana EDC at contact(at)tijuanaedc(dot)org or visit our website http://www.tijuanaedc.org

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Los Angeles utility takes steps to be coal free

The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is taking steps to wean its dependence on coal by the middle of next decade.

The city utility currently gets in Utah and Arizona. On Tuesday, the utility voted to amend its contract with Utah-based Intermountain Power Project to use its natural gas plant instead. The move still needs approval from City Council.

Officials say another agreement in the works to sell off LADWP's stake in the Arizona plant will make the utility coal-free by 2025. That's five years later than a promise by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who in 2009 predicted a coal-free Los Angeles in 2020.

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Religious Procession Fireworks Explosion Tepactepec

   
The victims were marching in an annual procession Friday in honor of Jesus Christ, the patron of Jesus Tepactepec, a village of about 1,000 people 70 miles (112 kilometers) east of Mexico City.

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/03/16/3919916/13-dead-dozens-hurt-in-mexico.html#storylink=rss#storylink=cpy

MEXICO CITY The death toll in a gruesome fireworks explosion during a religious procession has risen to 16, after three people more died at hospitals of their injuries.
A spokeswoman for the central Mexican state of Tlaxcala says a mass funeral is being held Sunday for 13 victims.
Spokeswoman Teresa Ramirez says about 80 people have been hospitalized. A total of about 154 were injured when a rocket malfunctioned and landed on the truck, igniting the fireworks it carried.
Residents told local media about finding bits of human remains blown into their yards, trees and patios by the blast.
   

Saturday, March 16, 2013

AB InBev Deal tying for more of Modelo Group

The U.S. Justice Department and beer giant Anheuser-Busch InBev , embroiled in a battle over whether AB InBev can expand its stake in Mexico's Grupo Modelo , asked a court on Friday to extend a delay in the court fight as they hold settlement talks.

"The parties agree that an extension of the current stay will likely enable the parties to complete their discussions," AB InBev, Modelo and Constellation Brands said in a statement.

"There can be no assurance that the ongoing discussions will be successful," they added.

The two sides requested that the delay be extended until April 9 from March 19.

The Justice Department had filed a lawsuit on January 31 aimed at stopping AB InBev, the world's largest brewer with some 200 brands, from buying the 50 percent of Modelo it does not already own for $20.1 billion.

When the deal was originally announced, AB InBev said it would sell its 50 percent share of Modelo's U.S. distributor, Crown Imports, to Constellation Brands, the world's largest wine company.

After the Justice Department sued to stop the deal, AB InBev announced that it was willing to sell Modelo's Piedras Negras brewery in Mexico near the U.S. border to Constellation for $2.9 billion and that it would grant Constellation perpetual rights for Corona and other Modelo brands in the United States.

A Justice Department spokeswoman was not immediately available for comment.

Despite a huge array of beers on store shelves, the U.S. beer market is dominated by two big players.

AB InBev is the top seller, with 200 brands ranging from big names like Budweiser and Stella Artois to craft-style beers like Shock Top and Goose Island. The No. 2 player is MillerCoors, a joint venture between SABMiller Plc and Molson Coors Brewing Co .

AB InBev, formed in 2008 when InBev bought Anheuser Busch, was the top U.S. brewer with 47 percent of the U.S. beer market going into the Modelo deal.

Analysts have said the main benefits of the proposed deal for AB InBev lie in Mexico, the world's fourth largest market in terms of profit generated, and in driving Corona sales abroad.

The deal has a huge upside for New York-based Constellation Brands Inc, the world's largest branded wine company, which makes Robert Mondavi and Ravenswood wines. It also sells spirits including Black Velvet Canadian Whisky and SVEDKA vodka.

The revised deal would make Constellation the third largest U.S. beer producer.

AB InBev and Constellation have agreed to a three-year transition period, during which Constellation plans to invest $400 million to expand Piedras Negras' capacity to enable it to supply 100 percent of U.S. needs, up from 60 percent today.

AB InBev would supply Constellation with beer, cans and other assistance over this period. Constellation would have the option to extend the beer supply period by up to two more years.

The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It is United States of America v. Anheuser-Busch InBev and Grupo Modelo. The case is No. 13-cv-00127.

Cancun Shooting

Two men armed with a machine gun and a handgun opened fire in a bar on the outskirts of the Mexican tourist resort of Cancun on Thursday, killing six people and wounding five, the office of the state's attorney general said.
Cancun, a major tourist destination on Mexico's Caribbean coast, has largely escaped the drug-related violence that has racked Acapulco, a faded tourist hot spot on the Pacific coast.
Last month, six Spanish women were raped by hooded gunmen who forced their way into the Acapulco beach house the women had rented.
Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto has vowed to reduce the violence that soared after his predecessor, Felipe Calderon, launched an assault on drug cartels.

Friday, March 15, 2013

Fed prison guard tries to shoot off wedding ring

A federal prison guard has been charged with shooting his own finger in a drunken attempt to remove his wedding ring during an argument with his wife at their northwestern Pennsylvania home, police said.           A criminal complaint said Bradford police were called just before 9 p.m. March 2 and were met by Alfredo Malespini III, 31, who told officers he was "trying to get rid of his wedding ring" and decided to "shoot it off." The Bradford Era first reported the shooting on Friday.           
The gunshot badly mangled Malespini's finger, but didn't remove the ring, police said.           
At the time of the shooting in Bradford, which is near the New York border about 130 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Malespini was employed as a lieutenant at the Federal Correctional Institution-McKean, a medium security prison a few miles away.           
Vicky Moser, the executive assistant at the prison, said she could confirm only that Malespini remains employed as a lieutenant at the prison, but could not comment as to whether he's been suspended or has otherwise taken leave.           
Bradford police Lt. Steve Caskey told The Associated Press that he wasn't sure of Malespini's employment status, but "as far as we know, he is still seeking treatment in Erie."           
Malespini was taken to UPMC Hamot hospital where he was treated for the gunshot wound and also for mental or emotional issues, Caskey said.           
Police have been called to the Malespini residence a "couple times" previously for domestic disputes, but Caskey said he doesn't believe Malespini had ever been charged with a crime before.           
On the day of the shooting, Malespini "had been drinking quite heavily throughout the day and he and his wife had been arguing throughout the day about an affair he had had several months ago," Caskey said.           
Malespini has been charged with disorderly conduct and was cited for firing a weapon within city limits but also is charged with reckless endangerment, a second-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to two years in prison. That's because the bullet Malespini fired could have endangered someone else, Caskey said.           

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Old Southern Mexico

Mexico used to be the place where Americans went to relax, let their hair down and maybe go a little wild. Resort towns like Acapulco, Mazatlán and Cancún drew thousands of tourists – from blue-haired retirees to party-hungry college kids – thanks to their good weather, cheap living and their Laissez-faire attitude to debauchery. Mexico’s ongoing drug war, however, has caused concern on both sides of the border that the escalating violence will turn on the tourist community – killing both the visitors and the cash flow that accompanies them. With the vicious rape of six Spanish tourists in Acapulco, followed by the slaying of a Belgian businessman and widespread violence on the outskirts of Mazatlán, tourists have avoided some locales – particularly after the U.S. State Department issued dire warning to U.S. travelers in the region. “Some places have been badly affected by the drug war,” said Peter Hakim, president emeritus of the Latin American think tank the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington D.C. The 2000-plus miles of shared border between the two countries and international media attention of the drug war – especially the more sensational crimes like the Acapulco rapes – have kept many tourists from the U.S. from venturing south of the border. This type of crime, especially the sensational type, always has a negative effect on tourism. - Christopher Wilson, Associated at the Woodrow Wilson Center Acapulco became a national and international tourist destination in the 1960s and 1970s, with the construction of a number of hotels along the Pacific coast and the expansion of the city’s port. The laying of the road known as the Ruta del Sol in 1990s opened up easy transport from Mexico City to Acapulco. During the last decade, Acapulco remained out of the drug war spotlight as former Mexican President Felipe Calderón and media attention focused on the violence in border cities such as Ciudad Juárez, Reynosa and Tijuana. Gun battles in the streets and the death of drug lord Arturo Beltran Leyva in 2009, however, helped ratchet the violence in Acapulco. In August of 2011, five headless bodies were discovered in Acapulco, three of which were in the city's main tourist area. “This type of crime, especially the sensational type, always has a negative effect on tourism,” said Christopher Wilson, a Mexico expert at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Mazatlán – a city on the Pacific coast in the state of Sinaloa – has seen violence related to the drug war surround the city due in large part to the presence of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán’s Sinaloa Cartel running rampant in the mountainous state. “We’ve had a bad rap with the drug problem,” Frank Córdova, Sinaloa’s secretary of tourism, told Fox News Latino. “We didn’t do our job we didn’t protect the port.” A number of infrastructure revitalizations, including a $60 million technology investment into the city’s main port, have led to a reduction in trafficking and violence in the city. City officials have also overhauled Mazatlán’s police force with the aim of freeing it from the corruption that has plagued local law enforcement throughout Mexico. Córdova, formerly Sinaloa’s secretary of security, said that the state’s problem with drug cartels has focused mainly in the wilderness outside the city and that by-and-large Mazatlán has remained safe. The U.S. State department only warned against travel outside of the city and around 25,000 Americans reside in the city. “This is like saying there is a violence problem in Miami when all the problems are in the Ozarks,” Córdova said. “It’s not happening in the city, but out in the mountains.” Despite heightened levels of violence in some Mexican resort towns, international tourism actually rose in 2011 in Mexico – when the last count was taken - and the vast majority of violent acts were not directed at tourists. Mexico’s tourism agency released new figures that showed the number of foreign travelers arriving by air in 2011 rose to 22.7 million, the most since the Bank of Mexico began keeping track in 1980. These figures come as an estimated 70,000 people died in violence related to the country’s ongoing drug war. An escalation in murders and other violent crimes arose soon after Calderón took office in 2006, when he declared an all-out military blitz on Mexico’s drug cartels. The agency did report a 3 percent drop in air travel from the U.S. to Mexico, other tourists – particularly from Brazil, Russia, Peru and China – bolstered the uptick in visitors. Experts argued that major cartels know their limits and don’t want to draw heat from federal or U.S. authorities. “Organized crime and gangs in Mexico are trying not to draw attention to themselves,” Wilson said. “The more organized they are, the less interested they are in going after tourists. They operate like a business.” Like travel anywhere, tourists visiting Mexico still should be wary of getting robbed or attacked as some smaller gangs and “lone wolf” criminals are still threats, Hakim said. “There are the cartels, there are the smaller groups and then there are those criminals who feel they’re not making enough and need to take advantage of the tourists,” Hakim said. “These lone wolf criminals are the ones that pose a threat.”

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Mexican Navy free 104 from Central America

The Mexican Navy said it had freed 104 Central American migrants apparently kidnapped by a crime organization in Nuevo Laredo. The navy said the rescue Friday followed a tip from a resident living near the home were the migrants were held, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday. Ninety-one men and 13 women were freed, officials said. Two of the migrants were from El Salvador and the rest from Honduras. Mexican cartels have been kidnapping and extorting Central American immigrants traveling through Mexico to the United States, the Times said. Sometimes the migrants are slaughtered. In Jalisco state, officials said gunmen assassinated Jose de Jesus Gallegos Alvarez, the state's tourism minister, in a suburb of Guadalajara on Saturday. The Times said Gallegos Alvarez had been tourism minister for only a few days. Reports in Mexico said his slaying likely was tied to business he conducted before taking the tourism position.

Mexico Bullying Death



Mexican officials said Tuesday they are investigating a father's complaint that his 7-year-old son died after a violent school bullying incident.
The governmental Human Rights Commission in the western state of Jalisco said it is investigating hospital and school officials for possible negligence in the death of the boy, whose name has not been released.
Luis Arturo Jimenez, the director of complaints for the rights commission, said the boy died over the weekend of an acute respiratory infection.
The boy's father told the commission that an older classmate had forcibly submerged the boy's head in a toilet at their government-run school in February.
The father said he took the boy to a government hospital, but doctors there failed to detect the infection and told him it was a stomach ailment.
The boy's condition worsened, apparently because fecal matter from the toilet had entered his lungs, and he died Saturday.
Neither the government agency that runs the hospital, not the Jalisco state Education Department, which runs the school, responded to requests for comment on the allegations.
Because the other boy who allegedly bullied him is only slightly older, it is unclear whether any charges can be brought in the case. Teenagers under 18 can be held accountable in the juvenile justice system.


Monday, March 11, 2013

Bump in the Road

Very thought provoking and poignant.  I do recall, however, the President referring to the Benghazi incident as "a bump in the road."  Today I heard an ex-Navy Seal being interviewed on Fox News regarding a book he has written about how to handle crisis situations in our lives.  At the end of the interview he asked if he could make a comment on Benghazi and of course the anchor said yes.  He then thanked Fox News for keeping the Benghazi story in the news, since other news organizations are not.  He said the Seals who died deserve the public knowing the truth about the whole affair.
 
The American diplomatic mission at Benghazi, in Libya, was attacked on September 11, 2012 by a heavily armed group. The attack began during the night at a compound that is meant to protect the consulate building. A second assault in the early morning the next day targeted a nearby CIA annex in a different diplomatic compound. Four people were killed, including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. Ten others were injured. The attack was strongly condemned by the governments of Libya, the United States, and many other countries throughout the world.
Many Libyans praised the late ambassador and staged public demonstrations against the militias that had formed during the Libyan civil war to oppose Colonel Gaddafi.[5][6][7] The Libyan government also began attempts to disband many of the groups.[8] The United States increased security worldwide at its various diplomatic and military facilities and began investigating the attack.[9][10] Initially, there was speculation that the attacks were a spontaneous response to a video, Innocence of Muslims,[11][12] but the Accountability Review Board found that it was in fact a premeditated attack by Islamist militants.[13] The Republican Party accused the Obama administration of over-emphasizing the role of the video,[14] and took issue with the investigation[14] and the response of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.[15] The mainstream American media faced criticism for the way it framed reports on the attacks, and there were many claims of bias by politicians on all sides of the political spectrum.[

In the aftermath of the attack, investigators identified more than a dozen violent events in Benghazi during the previous six months. On October 2, 2012, three weeks after the attacks, Darrell Issa (R-CA, chairman of the Committee) and Jason Chaffetz (R-UT, chairman of the subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense, and Foreign Operations) sent a letter to Secretary of State Clinton which listed a number of these events—including car jackings, kidnappings, assassination attempts, and gun battles. The letter stated, "Put together, these events indicated a clear pattern of security threats that could only be reasonably interpreted to justify increased security for U.S. personnel and facilities in Benghazi.".[17] According to Jack Murphy and Brandon Webb in "Benghazi: The Definitive Report," the Regional Security Office in Tripoli "compiled a list of 234 security incidents in Libya between June 2011 and July 2012, 50 of which took place in Benghazi."[18]:30

  • In April 2012, two former security guards for the consulate threw a homemade "fish bomb" IED over the consulate fence; the incident did not cause any casualties.[19] Just 4 days later, a similar bomb was thrown at a four vehicle convoy carrying the United Nations Special Envoy to Libya, exploding just 12 feet from the UN envoy’s vehicle without injuring anyone.[20]

  • In May 2012 an Al-Qaida affiliate calling itself the Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades claimed responsibility for an attack on the International Red Cross (ICRC) office in Benghazi. On August 6 the ICRC suspended operations in Benghazi. The head of the ICRC's delegation in Libya said the aid group was "appalled" by the attack and "extremely concerned" about escalating violence in Libya.[21]

  • The Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades released a video of what it said was its detonation of an explosive device outside the gates of the U.S. consulate on June 5, which caused no casualties but damaged the consulate's perimeter wall,[22][23] described by one individual as "big enough for forty men to go through."[17] The Brigades claimed that the attack was in response to the killing of Abu Yahya al Libi, a Libyan al-Qaeda leader who had just died in an American drone attack, and was also timed to coincide with the imminent arrival of a U.S. diplomat.[24][25] There were no injuries, but the group left behind leaflets promising more attacks against the U.S.[26]

  • British ambassador to Libya Dominic Asquith survived an assassination attempt in Benghazi on June 10. Two British protection officers were injured in the attack when their convoy was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade 300 yards from their consulate office.[27] The British Foreign Office withdrew all consular staff from Benghazi in late June.[28][29][30]

  • On June 18, 2012, the Tunisian consulate in Benghazi was stormed by individuals affiliated with Ansar Al-Sharia Libya, allegedly because of "attacks by Tunisian artists against Islam."[18]:31

  • On the day of the attack:
    • Al Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri declared that al Libi's death still needed to be avenged.[31]
    • In Egypt, 2000 Salafist activists protested against the film "Innocence of Muslims" at 5pm EET (11am EDT) at the US embassy in Cairo.[32]
    • President Obama was attending a 9/11 ceremony in the morning, and in the afternoon he visited with wounded veterans at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for two-and-a-half hours about the time the Benghazi attack began.[33]
    • Two consulate security guards spotted a man in a Libyan police uniform taking pictures of the consulate with his cell phone from a nearby building that was under construction. The security guards briefly detained the man before releasing him. He drove away in a police car and a complaint was made to the Libyan police station. Sean Smith noticed this surveillance, posting on the internet "assuming we don't die tonight. We saw one of our 'police' that guard the compound taking pictures."[18]:34

After the attack, CNN reported that a Benghazi security official and a battalion commander had met with U.S. diplomats three days before the attack and had warned the Americans about deteriorating security in the area. The official told CNN that the diplomats had been advised, "The situation is frightening, it scares us."[34]

On September 14, CNN correspondent Arwa Damon found Ambassador Stevens' diary at the unsecured site of the attack. In it, Stevens expressed his concern about the growing al-Qaeda presence in the area and his worry about being on an al-Qaeda hit list. The U.S. State Department later accused CNN of violating privacy and breaking its promise to Stevens' family that it would not report on the diary.[35]

The attack


The Benghazi attack consisted of military assaults on two separate U.S. diplomatic compounds. The first assault occurred at the main compound, approximately 300 yards long and 100 yards wide, at about 9:40 pm local time (3:40 pm EDT, Washington DC). The second assault took place at a CIA annex 1.2 miles away at about 4 am the following morning.[36] It has been referred to as the Battle of Benghazi.[37][38][39][40]

Assault on the Consulate


Between 125 and 150 gunmen, "some wearing the Afghan-style tunics favored by Islamic militants," are reported to have participated in the assault.[41][42][43] Some had their faces covered and wore flak jackets.[44] Weapons they used during the attack included rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), hand grenades, AK-47 and FN F2000 NATO assault rifles, diesel canisters, mortars, and heavy machine guns and artillery mounted on gun trucks.[45][46]

The assault began at nightfall, with the attackers sealing off streets leading to the main compound with gun trucks.[41] The trucks bore the logo of Ansar al-Sharia, a group of Islamist militants working with the local government to manage security in Benghazi.[41]

The area outside the compound before the assault was quiet; one Libyan guard who was wounded in the attack was quoted as saying “there wasn’t a single ant outside.”[42] There was no sign of a spontaneous protest against an American-made movie denigrating Islam's Prophet Muhammad. But a lawyer passing by the scene said he saw the militants gathering around 20 youths from nearby to chant against the film."[41] No more than seven Americans were in the compound, including Ambassador Stevens, who was visiting Benghazi at the time to review plans to establish a new cultural center and modernize a hospital.[47] Ambassador Stevens had his last meeting of the day with a Turkish diplomat and escorted him to the main gate at about 8:30 pm (local time). The street outside the compound was calm; the State Department reported no unusual activity during the day outside.[48] Ambassador Stevens retired to his room about 9 pm; he was alone in the building, according to guards interviewed later.[49]

About 9:40 pm (local time) large numbers of armed men shouting "Allāhu Akbar" descended on the compound from multiple directions.[42][50] The attackers lobbed grenades over the wall and entered the compound under a barrage of automatic weapons fire and RPGs, backed by truck-mounted artillery and anti-aircraft machine guns.[41][49] A Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) agent viewed on the consulate's security cameras "a large number of men, armed men, flowing into the compound."[48] He hit the alarm and started shouting, “Attack! Attack!” over the loudspeaker.[51] Phone calls were made to the embassy in Tripoli, the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington, the Libyan February 17 Brigade, and a U.S. quick reaction force located at a second compound (the annex) a little more than a mile away.[43][52] Ambassador Stevens telephoned Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Hicks in Tripoli to tell him the consulate was under attack. Mr. Hicks did not recognize the phone number so he didn't answer it, twice. On the third attempt Mr. Hicks answered the call from Ambassador Stevens.[53]

Diplomatic Security Service Special Agent Scott Strickland secured Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith, an information management officer, in the main building's safe haven.[52][54] Other agents retrieved their M4 carbines and tactical gear from another building. They tried to return to the main building but encountered armed attackers and retreated.[52]

The attackers entered the main building and rattled the locked metal grille of the safe haven.[51] They carried jerrycans of diesel fuel, spread the fuel over the floor and furniture, and set fires.[51][52] As thick smoke filled the building, Stevens, Smith, and Strickland moved to the bathroom and lay on the floor, but they decided to leave the safe haven after being overcome by smoke.[54] Strickland exited through the window, but Stevens and Smith did not follow him. Strickland returned back several times but couldn't find them in the smoke; he went up to the roof and radioed other agents.[54]

Three agents returned to the main building in an armored vehicle; they searched the building and found Smith's body, but not Stevens.[54]

The Regional Security Office sounded the alarm and placed calls to the Benghazi CIA annex and the embassy in Tripoli, saying, "We're under attack, we need help, please send help now..." Then the call cut off. After some discussion, the CIA's Global Response Staff (GRS) at the CIA annex, which included senior security operative Tyrone Woods, decided to implement a rescue. By 10:05pm, the team was briefed and loaded into their armored Toyota Land Cruisers. By this time, communicators at the CIA annex were notifying the chain of command about current developments, and a small CIA and JSOC element in Tripoli that included Glen Doherty was attempting to find a way to Benghazi.[18]:39-43

The GRS team from the CIA annex arrived at the consulate and attempted to secure the perimeter and locate the ambassador and Sean Smith. They located Smith, who was unconscious and later declared dead, but were unable to find Stevens in the smoke-filled building. The team then decided to return to the annex with the survivors and Smith's body. While en route back to the annex, the group's armored vehicle was hit by AK-47 rifle fire and hand grenades. The vehicle was able to make it to its destination with two flat tires, however, and the gates to annex were closed behind them at 11:50pm.[18]:43-45[36]

Abdel-Monem Al-Hurr, the spokesman for Libya's Supreme Security Committee, said roads leading to the Benghazi consulate compound were sealed off and Libyan state security forces had surrounded it.[55]

Immediate reaction in the United States


Diplomatic Security Service agents/Regional Security Officers informed their headquarters in Washington about the attack just as it was beginning at about 9:40 local time (3:40PM Eastern Time). By 4:30 Eastern, Pentagon officials informed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta about the attack. The Pentagon ordered an unmanned aerial vehicle that was in the air conducting surveillance on militant camps to fly over Benghazi. The drone arrived at 5:11 and began providing a video feed to Washington. At 5:41, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Petraeus to coordinate. The CIA, which made up most of the US government's presence in Benghazi, had a ten-member security team at its annex and the State Department believed that this team would assist the consulate in the event of an attack.[56]

Recovery of Ambassador Stevens


At about 1 am the body of Ambassador Stevens was found by local citizens and taken to the Benghazi Medical Center. At the hospital Stevens was administered CPR for 90 minutes by Dr. Ziad Abu Zeid.[57] According to Abu Zeid, Stevens died from asphyxiation caused by smoke inhalation. A 22-year-old freelance videographer, Fahd al-Bakoush, later published a video[58] showing Libyans trying to extract the unconscious ambassador from a smoke-filled room,[59][60] where he was found unconscious, which confirms reports that suggested the U.S. envoy died of asphyxiation after the building was set afire.[61]

Some of the Libyans who entered the compound tried to rescue Stevens after they found him lying alone on the floor in a dark smoke-filled room with a locked door accessible only by a window. A group of men pulled him out of the room through the window, and then placed him on the courtyard's stone tile floor. The crowd cheered "God is great" when Stevens was found to be alive. He was then rushed to the hospital in a private car as there was no ambulance to carry him.[62]

Dr. Ziad Abu Zeid, the Libyan doctor who treated Stevens, said Stevens died of severe asphyxiation, that Stevens had no other injuries, and that he tried for 45 minutes to revive him.[63] The doctor said he believed that officers from the Libyan Interior Ministry transported the body to the airport and into United States custody. State Department officials said they do not know who took Stevens to the hospital or transported the body to the airport and into U.S. custody.[63]

Assault on the CIA annex


Just after midnight, an attack on the CIA annex began, which included machine gun, rocket and mortar fire attack. The CIA defenses were able to hold off the attack until the morning of September 12.[18]:45-46 Early in the morning, Libyan government forces met up with a group of Americans (reinforcements from Tripoli including Glen Doherty[64]) that had arrived at the Benghazi airport. The team, which included 2 active duty JSOC operators and five CIA personnel, had commandeered a small jet in Tripoli by paying the pilots $30,000 and forcing them to fly the team to Benghazi.[18]:43 After being held up at the airport for a few hours, the Libyan forces and newly arrived Americans went to the CIA annex at about 5am to assist in transporting approximately 32 Americans at the annex back to the airport for evacuation. Minutes after they drove through the gates, the annex came under heavy fire. The team immediately took up defensive positions. With a lull in the fighting, Glen Doherty began searching for his friend, Tyrone Woods, and he was told he was on the roof manning an MK46 machine gun. He found Woods on the roof with two other agents, they quickly embraced, filled each other in, and retook defensive firing positions. After only a few minutes, a mortar round hit Wood's position, fatally wounding him. As Doherty attempted to reposition and take cover, a second round fell on him, killing him instantly.[18]:46-47[65] 31-year-old David Ubben suffered shrapnel injuries and several broken bones in the mortar attacks, and according to Ubben's father, "The first [mortar] dropped 50 yards short and the next two were right on target.".[66]

Immediately, several agents ran onto the roof to assess damage and help the wounded, who were taken from the roof with a ladder. At the same time, a JSOC operator was using a hand-held device displaying images from a Predator drone above, which had been sent by the DOD's Africa Command after request. The operator told the Chief of Base, "There's a large element assembling, and we need to get everyone out of here now!" Evacuation was agreed upon, and everyone was notified to collect their personal security items and evacuate. Within minutes, vehicles were loaded, and they headed to the airport. On the way, they were hit with small arms fire, but arrived with no further injuries.[18]:47-48

During the fighting, the CIA had successfully rescued six State Department personnel, recovered Smith's body, and had evacuated about thirty Americans out of Benghazi alive. Just under 100 attackers were killed in the fighting.[18]:46, 48

Evacuation


The bodies were taken to Benina International Airport and flown to the capital, Tripoli, and scheduled to fly to a U.S. airbase in Germany. From Germany, the four bodies arrived at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington, DC, where President Barack Obama and members of his cabinet held a ceremony in honor of those killed.

After the attack, all diplomatic staff were moved to the capital, Tripoli, with nonessential personnel to be flown out of Libya. Sensitive documents remained missing, including documents listing the names of Libyans working with the Americans, and documents relating to oil contracts.[67]

A U.S. Army commando unit was sent to Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily, Italy the night of the attack but did not deploy to Benghazi.[68]

Four Americans died in the attack: Ambassador Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith,[69] and two embassy security personnel, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods,[70][71] both former Navy SEALs.[72][73] Senior intelligence officials later acknowledged that Woods and Doherty were contracted by Central Intelligence Agency, not the State Department as previously identified,[74] and were part of a Global Response Staff (GRS), a team that provides security to CIA case officers and countersurveillance and surveillance protection.[75] On September 14 the remains of the slain Americans were returned to the United States. President Barack Obama and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton honored the Benghazi victims at the Transfer of Remains Ceremony held at Andrews Air Force Base, Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

Initial reports indicated that ten Libyan guards died; this was later retracted and it was reported that seven Libyans were injured.[76] Three Americans were injured in the attack and treated at an American Military Hospital in Germany.[77]

Glen Doherty


Glen Anthony Doherty (c. 1970 – September 11, 2012) of Encinitas,[78] was a native of Winchester, Massachusetts,[79] and a 1988 graduate of Winchester High School.[80] Doherty was the second of three children born to Bernard and Barbara Doherty. He trained as a pilot at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University before moving to Snowbird, Utah for several winters and then joining the United States Navy. Doherty served as a Navy SEAL, responded to the bombing of the USS Cole, had tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, and left the Navy in 2005 as a Petty Officer First Class.[81] After leaving the Navy, he worked for a private security company in Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Kenya and Libya.[79] In the month prior to the attack, Doherty as a contractor with the State Department told ABC News in an interview that he personally went into the field in Libya to track down MANPADS, shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles, and destroy them.[82]

Doherty was a member of the advisory board of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an organization that opposes proselytizing by religious groups in the United States military.[83] Doherty was coauthor of the book The 21st Century Sniper.[83][84]

Doherty's funeral was held at Saint Eulalia's parish in his native Winchester on September 19, 2012.[85] His Celebration of Life was held in Encinitas, California the weekend of October 12–14, 2012.[86][87]

Tyrone S. Woods


Tyrone Snowden Woods (January 15, 1971 – September 12, 2012), of Imperial Beach,[78] was born in Portland, Oregon.[88] Woods graduated from Oregon City High School in 1989,[88] south of Portland, Oregon, and served 20 years of honorable service in the U.S. Navy before joining State Department Diplomatic Security[89] as a U.S. embassy security personnel,[71] working under a service contract.[90] Since 2010, Woods had protected American diplomats in posts from Central America to the Middle East.[91]

As a Navy SEAL in 2005-06, Woods was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with combat 'V' Device for valor in Iraq.[89][92] He led 12 direct action raids and 10 reconnaissance missions leading to the capture of 34 enemy insurgents in the volatile Al Anbar province.[89] He served multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Middle East and Central America.[93] He retired as a Senior Chief Petty Officer in 2007.[92]

Woods also served with distinction at the Naval Medical Center San Diego as a registered nurse and certified paramedic.[92] Having settled in Imperial Beach, California, for a year of his retirement he owned The Salty Frog bar there; he is survived by his second wife, Dr. Dorothy Narvaez-Woods, their one daughter, and two sons from a previous marriage.[94]

Responsibility



David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times reported that 20-year-old neighbor Mohamed Bishari witnessed the attack. According to Bishari, it was launched without warning or protest and was led by the Islamist militia Ansar al-Sharia (different from the group called Ansar al-Sharia based in Yemen designated by the U.N. and the U.S. Department of State as a terrorist organization[95]). Kirkpatrick reported that Ansar al-Sharia said they were launching the assault in retaliation for the release of the anti-Islamic video, Innocence of Muslims.[96][97] It was further reported that Ahmed Abu Khattala was called a ringleader of the attack by both witnesses and authorities, though he insisted he did not play a part in the aggression at the American compound. Witnesses, Benghazi residents, and Western news reports have described him as a leader of Ansar al-Sharia, though he stated he was close to the group but not an official part of it. He further stated he was the commander of an Islamist brigade, Abu Obaida ibn al-Jarrah, some of who's members had joined Ansar al-Sharia.[98] In October 2012, a Tunisian Ali Harzi, who a US intelligence official stated had links to Ansar al-Sharia and al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, was arrested in Turkey and repatriated to Tunisia on terrorism charges and possible links to the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi.[99] In the same month, a Libyan suspect Karim el-Azizi, who had recently returned to Egypt from Libya and was storing weapons in his hideout, detonated a bomb and was found dead in his apartment after clashes with security forces.[100] Ali Harzi was released by Tunisian authorities on January 8, 2013 due to lack of evidence.[101]

The Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades, a pro-al-Qaeda militia calling for the release of The Blind Sheik, was implicated in the attack by Noman Benotman of the Quilliam Foundation.[1][102][103] CNN,[1] the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,[104] Commentary Magazine[103] and The Daily Telegraph[102] have listed this group as a chief suspect. USA Today reported that protests in Cairo which preceeded the attack on Benghazi were intended to protest the imprisonment of Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman and announced as early as August 30.[105][106] Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi had called for release of the Blind Sheikh in his inaugural address.[106] According to Joan Neuhaus Schaan of the James Baker Institute, "The primary reason for the focus on the video was likely to cast the Americans’ deaths as an unfortunate and unforeseen incident resulting from an inflamed crowd. That video story redirected the debate from scrutinizing our Libyan policies that were supporting known extremists, to a debate centered on blasphemy."[106]

In the days and weeks following the attack, President Obama and one senior administration official stated that the video was an excuse for the attack. Two days after the attack, CNN reporter Sarah Aarthun quoted an anonymous senior U.S. administration official: "It was not an innocent mob. The video or 9/11 made a handy excuse and could be fortuitous from their perspective but this was a clearly planned military-type attack."[107] In his September 18 appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman, President Obama said that "extremists and terrorists used (the anti-Muslim YouTube video) as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies."[12] In his Univision Town Hall appearance on September 20, President Obama said that the "natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."[108] The U.S. government later had to retract these statements when it became increasingly apparent that there was no protest outside the consulate in Benghazi and that the violence had little to do with a video.[18]:56 A later report from an independent review board concluded "there was no protest prior to the attacks."[109]

In their book, "Benghazi: The Definitive Report," Jack Murphy and Brandon Webb report a contributing factor to the attack were covert JSOC operations in Libya planned and executed by Deputy National Security Advisor John O. Brennan, with tacit support from Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Michael G. Vickers, Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, and Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command Admiral William H. McRaven, which led to a retaliation from militias such as Ansar al-Sharia.[18]:25, 29, 56-58 Sometime in mid-summer 2012, Brennan directed JSOC to conduct combat operations in Libya targeting high-level Al Qaeda operatives within Libya militia organizations. While Murphy and Webb say these operations targeting Al Qaeda leaders in Libya such as Ezedin Abdel Aziz Khalil may be warranted, the problem occurs when "their actions move a multi-billion-dollar counter-terrorist apparatus across the world, and its operations begin to get out of control...all with a non-elected political appointee running the show." They report that with Brennan running his own private war, he did not go through the normal chain of command, and operations were not deconflicted (a term referring to the avoidance of conflict between operations among agencies). Therefore, Ambassador Stevens was not read in on the JSOC operations, and was kept in the dark and ultimately killed in a retaliation that he never could have seen coming. Similarly, the CIA was also surprised by the Benghazi attack, which even days later thought Ansar al-Sharia was upset over a video. These problems were only exacerbated by poor communication between the CIA, State Department, and Department of Defense.[18]:58-60 The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the book,[110] and United States Special Operations Command made a statement that they don't confirm or deny operations.[111]

Aftermath and controversy


Libyan response


Libyan Prime Minister Mustafa Abushagur's office condemned the attack and extended condolences, saying: "While strongly condemning any attempt to abuse the person of Muhammad, or an insult to our holy places and prejudice against the faith, we reject and strongly condemn the use of force to terrorise innocent people and the killing of innocent people." It also reaffirmed "the depth of relationship between the peoples of Libya and the U.S., which grew closer with the positions taken by the U.S. government in support of the revolution of February 17."[112] Mohamed Yousef el-Magariaf, the President of the General National Congress of Libya, said: "We apologise to the United States, the people and to the whole world for what happened. We confirm that no-one will escape from punishment and questioning."[113]

There were demonstrations in Benghazi[114] and Tripoli[115] on September 12, condemning the violence and holding signs such as "Chris Stevens was a friend to all Libyans," "Benghazi is against terrorism," and other signs apologizing to Americans for the actions in their name and in the name of Muslims. On the same day, Libya's Deputy Ambassador to London Ahmad Jibril told the BBC that Ansar Al-Sharia was behind the attack.[116][117] On September 13, at a US State Department reception in Washington D.C., the Libyan ambassador to the US Ali Aujali apologized to Secretary of State Clinton for “this terrorist attack which took place against the American consulate in Libya.”[117][118] The ambassador further praised Stevens as a "dear friend" and a "real hero". He also urged the United States to continue supporting Libya as it went "through a very difficult time" and that the young Libyan government needed help so that it could "maintain...security and stability in our country."

In the days after the attack, The New York Times stated that young Libyans had flooded Twitter with pro-American messages after the attacks.[115] Think Progress stated that Libyans are typically more positively inclined towards the United States than their neighbors.[119] A 2012 Gallup poll noted that "A majority of Libyans (54%) surveyed in March and April 2012 approve of the leadership of the U.S. – among the highest approval Gallup has ever recorded in the... region, outside of Israel." [120] Another poll in Eastern Libya, taken in 2011, reported that the population was at the same time both deeply religious conservative Muslims and very pro-American, with 90% of respondents reporting favorable views of the United States.[121][122]

The Libyan response to the crisis was praised and appreciated in the United States, and President Obama emphasized how the Libyans "helped our diplomats to safety" to an American audience the following day,[5] while a New York Times editorial criticized Egypt's government for not doing "what Libyan leaders did." [123]

On September 16, Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf said that the attack on the U.S. consulate was planned months in advance,[124] and further stated that “[t]he idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous. We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate.”[125]

Anti-militia demonstrations


On September 21, about 30,000 Libyans marched through Benghazi calling for support of the rule of law and for an end to the armed militias that had formed during the Libyan civil war to oppose Colonel Gaddafi.[6][7] After that war, the militias failed to disband, and continually menaced the Libyan government and populace.[126] Carrying signs with slogans such as "We Want Justice For Chris" and "Libya Lost a Friend," the protestors stormed several militia headquarters, including that of Ansar al-Sharia, an Islamist militia who some allege played a role in the attack on U.S. diplomatic personnel on September 11.[127][128] At least 10 people were killed and dozens more wounded as militiamen fired on demonstrators at the headquarters of Sahaty Brigade, a pro-government militia "operating under the authority of the ministry of defence."[6][128][129]

By early next morning, the protestors had forced militia members to flee and seized control of a number of compounds, releasing four prisoners found inside.[127][128] Protesters burnt a car and a building of at least one facility, and looted weapons.[6][7][128] The militia compounds and many weapons were handed over to Libya's national army[7] in what "appeared to be part of a coordinated sweep of militia bases by police, government troops and activists" following the earlier demonstrations.[127][128] Some militia members accused the protestors of being Gaddafi loyalists, looking to disarm the militias in the wake of the revolution.[7]

Government campaign to disband militias


On September 23, taking advantage of the growing momentum and rising anger against the militias evinced in the earlier anti-militia demonstrations,[130] the Libyan president declared that all unauthorized militias had 48 hours to either disband or come under government control.[8][131] The government also mandated that bearing arms in public was now illegal, as were armed checkpoints.[131]

It has been noted that previously, handling the militias had been difficult as the government had been forced to rely on some of them for protection and security.[8][130] However, according to a Libyan interviewed in Tripoli, the government gained the ability to push back against the militias because of a "mandate of the people."[8]

On the 24th, the government commenced with a raid on a former military base held by a rogue infantry militia.[132]

Across the country, militias began surrendering to the government. The government formed a "National Mobile Force" for the purpose of evicting illegal militias.[133] On the same day as the declaration, various militias in Misrata held meetings, ultimately deciding to submit to the government's authority, and handed over various public facilities they had been holding, including the city's three main jails, which were handed over to the authority of the Ministry of Justice.[8] Hours before the announcement, in Derna, the two main militias (one of them Ansar al-Sharia) active in the city both withdrew, leaving both their five military bases behind.[8][130][133]

Hundreds of Libyans, mainly former rebel fighters, gathered in the city centers of Tripoli and Benghazi to hand over their weapons to the government on the 29th of September.[134]

However, the campaign has been less successful in other areas, such as the remote Nafusa Mountains, inhabited by the Nafusi-speaking Berber minority, where the Emirati news agency The National reported on 23 September that arms were being hoarded. The National also reported arms being hoarded in Misrata, despite simultaneous reporting by other outlets that militias were surrendering in Misrata.[135]

U.S. government response


President Barack Obama, with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, delivering a statement at the White House on September 12, 2012 in which he condemned the attack on the U.S. consulate.[136]

On September 12 U.S. President Barack Obama condemned "this outrageous attack" on U.S. diplomatic facilities[137] and stated that "[s]ince our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."[137] After referring to "the 9/11 attacks," "troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan", and "then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi"[137] the President then stated that "[a]s Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it."[137] He then went on to say, "[n]o acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."[137]

After the attack, Obama ordered that security be increased at all such facilities worldwide.[9] A 50-member Marine FAST team was sent to Libya to "bolster security."[138] It was announced that the FBI would investigate the possibility of the attack being planned.[139] U.S. officials said surveillance over Libya would increase, including the use of unmanned drones, to "hunt for the attackers."[139]

Secretary of State Clinton also made a statement on September 12, describing the perpetrators as "heavily armed militants" and "a small and savage group – not the people or government of Libya."[140] She also reaffirmed "America’s commitment to religious tolerance" and said "Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our Embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the internet," but whether true or not, that was not a justification for violence.[141] The State Department had previously identified embassy and personnel security as a major challenge in its budget and priorities report.[142]

On September 12 it was reported that the United States Navy dispatched two Arleigh Burke class destroyers, the USS McFaul and the USS Laboon, to the Libyan coast.[143] The destroyers are equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles. American UAVs were also sent to fly over Libya to search for the perpetrators of the attack.[144]

In a speech on September 13 in Golden, Colorado, President Obama paid tribute to the four Americans "killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya," stating, "We enjoy our security and our liberty because of the sacrifices they make...I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly present to the rest of the world."[145]

In his press briefing on September 14, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters that "we don't have and did not have concrete evidence to suggest that this [the Benghazi attack] was not in reaction to the film."[146] He went on to say: "There was no intelligence that in any way could have been acted on to prevent these attacks. It is – I mean, I think the DNI spokesman was very declarative about this that the report is false. The report suggested that there was intelligence that was available prior to this that led us to believe that this facility would be attacked, and that is false." We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive. And while the violence is reprehensible and unjustified, it is not a reaction to the 9/11 anniversary that we know of, or to U.S. policy."

President Barack Obama and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton honor the Benghazi victims at the Transfer of Remains Ceremony held at Andrews Air Force Base, Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, September 14, 2012.

On September 14 the remains of the slain Americans were returned to the U.S. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attended the ceremony. In her remarks Clinton said, "One young woman, her head covered and her eyes haunted with sadness, held up a handwritten sign that said 'Thugs and killers don’t represent Benghazi nor Islam.' The President of the Palestinian Authority, who worked closely with Chris when he served in Jerusalem, sent me a letter remembering his energy and integrity, and deploring – and I quote – 'an act of ugly terror.'[147] She went on to say: "We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with."

On the same day, federal probation officers met with the writer and producer of the controversial anti-Islam film "Innocence of Muslims", Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, to determine whether his involvement in the film violated the terms of his probation, which barred him from both accessing the internet without approval and using any names other than his legal name.[148] The probation stemmed from a 2010 conviction of bank fraud.

A report prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, stated “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.” [149] This initial assessment was provided to Executive Branch officials.[150]

On September 16 the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five major interview shows to discuss the attacks. Prior to her appearance, Rice was provided with "talking points" from a CIA memo, which stated:

The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations. This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and as currently available information continues to be evaluated. The investigation is on-going, and the US Government is working with Libyan authorities to bring to justice those responsible for the deaths of US citizens.[10][151]

Using these talking points as a guide,[152] Rice stated:

"Based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy—sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that-- in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent." "We do not-- we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.""I think it's clear that there were extremist elements that joined in and escalated the violence. Whether they were al Qaeda affiliates, whether they were Libyan-based extremists or al Qaeda itself I think is one of the things we'll have to determine."[153][154][155][156][157]

In a White House press briefing on September 18, press secretary Jay Carney explained the attack to reporters: "I’m saying that based on information that we – our initial information, and that includes all information – we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video. And that is what we know thus far based on the evidence, concrete evidence."[11]

On September 20, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney answered a question about an open hearing with the National Counterterrorism Center Director, Matthew G. Olsen, which referenced which extremist groups might have been involved. Carney said, "It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials. So, again, that’s self-evident."[158] On the same day, during an appearance on Univision, a Spanish-language television network in the United States, President Obama stated, "What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."[159][160][161][162][163]

On September 25, in an address before the United Nations General Assembly President Obama stated, "The attacks on our civilians in Benghazi were attacks on America...And there should be no doubt that we will be relentless in tracking down the killers and bringing them to justice."[47][164] He referred to "Innocence of Muslims" as "a crude and disgusting video [that] sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world." He said, "I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity." He further stated, "There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy."

On September 26 Clinton acknowledged a possible link between Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and the September 11 attack.[3]

On September 27, the filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula was arrested and ordered detained without bail due to probation violations.[148]

On September 28, U.S. intelligence stated "In the immediate aftermath, there was information that led us to assess that the attack began spontaneously following protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo. We provided that initial assessment to Executive Branch officials and members of Congress . . . . As we learned more about the attack, we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists. It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their members to participate."[150]

To assist the Libyan government in disbanding extremist groups, the Obama administration allocated $8 million to begin building an elite Libyan commando force over the next year.[165]

Criticism of U.S. government response


Republican Party members immediately accused the Obama White House and State Department of over-emphasizing the role of Islamic anger over the anti-Islamic movie Innocence of Muslims and alleged that the administration was reluctant to label the attack as "terrorist".[14] Representative Mike Rogers (R-MI), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who on the 13th of September said that the attacks had all the hallmarks of a coordinated attack by al-Qaeda,[166] has questioned whether there were any protests at all in Benghazi, saying: "I have seen no information that shows that there was a protest going on as you have seen around any other embassy at the time. It was clearly designed to be an attack."[167] According to critics, the consulate site should have been secured better both before and after the attack.

On the 20th, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a classified briefing to U.S. Senators,[168] which several Republican attendees criticized.[15] According to the article, senators were angered at the Obama administration's rebuff of their attempts to learn details of the Benghazi attack, only to see that information published the next day in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.

GOP legislators also took issue with delays in the investigation, which CNN attributed to "bureaucratic infighting" between the FBI, Justice, and State. On the 26th, Senator Johnny Isakson (R-Georgia) said he "cannot believe that the FBI is not on the ground yet."[14]

On CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley on September 30, Crowley observed that "Friday we got the administration's sort of definitive statement that this now looks as though it was a pre-planned attack by a terrorist group, some of whom were at least sympathetic to al Qaeda," and asked the senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator John McCain, "why do you think and are you bothered that it has taken them this long from September 11th to now to get to this conclusion?" to which McCain replied that "it interferes with the depiction that the administration is trying to convey that al Qaeda is on the wane... how else could you trot out our U.N. ambassador to say this was a spontaneous demonstration?... It was either willful ignorance or abysmal intelligence to think that people come to spontaneous demonstrations with heavy weapons, mortars, and the attack goes on for hours."[169]

On CBS's Face the Nation on October 28, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said "we know that there were tapes, recordings inside the consulate during this fight.... So the president went on various shows, despite what he said in the Rose Garden, about terrorist acts, he went on several programs, including The View including Letterman, including before the UN where he continued to refer, days later, many days later, to this as a spontaneous demonstration because of a hateful video. We know that is patently false. What did the president know? When did he know it? And what did he do about it?"[170] However, CBS News reported earlier on October 24 that the video of the assault was recovered 20 days after the attack, from the more than 10 security cameras at the compound.[171] On the same day, emails had been released showing that the White House, contrary to its public assertions, had already known of ties between terrorist organizations and the extremists who murdered U.S. personnel in Benghazi.[172]

U.S. media response




A study released on November 2 found that leading newspapers in the U.S. framed the attack in terms of a spontaneous protest (the Obama administration’s version) four times as often as a planned terrorist attack (the Republican version).[173] The study was based on a computer-assisted analysis of 2,572 words and phrases related to the attack in 348 news stories from September 12 to October 12 in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and USA Today. On the day of that study's release, two of the newspapers—The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal—published editorials critical of the Obama administration's handling of Benghazi. The Washington Post editorial asked such questions as, "Did the Obama administration’s political preoccupation with maintaining a light footprint in Libya lead to an ill-considered reliance on local militias, rather than on U.S. forces?"[174] The Wall Street Journal editorial asked such questions as "Why did the U.S. not heed warnings about a growing Islamist presence in Benghazi and better protect the diplomatic mission and CIA annex?" and "Why has the Administration's story about what took place in Benghazi been so haphazard and unclear?"[175]

On November 4, two days before the presidential election, CBS News released a portion of its interview with President Obama for 60 Minutes that was filmed on September 12 but did not air originally on its September 23 show.[176] Journalist Bret Baier, host of Special Report with Bret Baier, noted that in these newly released portions of the interview "Obama would not say whether he thought the attack was terrorism. Yet he would later emphasize at a presidential debate that in the Rose Garden the same day, he had declared the attack an act of terror."[177] Baier noted that President Obama had been saying that he declared the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack since his announcement in the Rose Garden on September 12 and highlighted the newly released video interview with Steve Kroft: "KROFT: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word terrorism in connection with the Libya Attack, do you believe that this was a terrorism attack? OBAMA: Well it’s too early to tell exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other."[177]

Allegations of media bias


Some have argued that the mainstream media have ignored or played down the significance of the Benghazi story; and some have also pointed to an alleged liberal bias, claiming that, if a Republican were president, there would have been much more critical and aggressive reporting.[16][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186]

On the last weekend of October a message posted on Facebook by a Political Action Committee (SOS PAC) claiming President Obama denied them backup in Benghazi was taken down twice by the social networking site. After the post was removed and SOS’s Facebook account suspended for 24 hours, the post was reinstated and SOS received an email from Facebook apologizing for the matter.[172]

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer argued on Fox News' channel's Special Report with Bret Baier on October 24, “This is really a journalistic scandal. I mean, the fact there was not a word about any of this in the [New York] Times or the [Washington] Post today.” Krauthammer was referring to recently released emails that proved that the White House, contrary to its assertions, knew of terrorist connections to the attack almost immediately.[187]

The National Review argued that, on October 28 (less than 2 weeks before the presidential election), of the five Sunday news shows, only Fox News treated it as a major story. It argued that on the other four news shows, the issue came up only when Republicans mentioned it.[188] On NBC's Meet the Press, host David Gregory changed the subject when a guest tried to bring up the subject of the Benghazi attack, saying, "Let's get to Libya a little bit later." Gregory never did get back to Benghazi.[188][189]

A November 2, 2012 article in The Huffington Post detailed how The Associated Press, The New York Times, and The Washington Post held back information about the attack at the request of the CIA and the Obama administration.[190] The media organizations held back information at the government's request that the two former SEALs killed in the attack (Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty) were working for the CIA.

On November 26, 2012, journalist Tom Ricks went on Fox News' Happening Now with Jon Scott to discuss the attack. While being interviewed on Fox News by Jon Scott, Ricks accused Fox News of being "extremely political" in its coverage of the attack and said that "Fox was operating as a wing of the Republican Party." Ricks accused the network of covering the story more than it needed to be. The interview was cut short and Ricks and the interview was not mentioned or covered by Fox News again. Fox News was subsequently criticized for cutting the interview short.[191][192] Jon Scott was also criticized by Media Matters for America for making no mention of the interview on Fox News Watch, a media analysis program he hosts.[193][194] In an interview with the Associated Press, Fox News' White House correspondent Ed Henry suggested that he thought Benghazi was being covered too much by the network. Henry said, “We’ve had the proper emphasis, but I would not be so deluded to say that some of our shows, some of our commentators, have covered it more than it needed to be covered.”[195][196]

Investigation



Accountability Review Board


U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton convened an Accountability Review Board as required by the Omnibus Diplomatic and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 to investigate the Benghazi attack. Four members were selected by Clinton and another was selected by Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper. Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering served as the Chairman, Admiral Michael Mullen served as the Vice Chairman, also serving were Catherine Bertini, Richard Shinnick, and Hugh Turner, who represented the intelligence community.[197]

ARB Report


The investigation report was seen as a sharp criticism of State Department officials in Washington for ignoring requests for more guards and safety upgrades, and for failing to adapt security procedures to a deteriorating security environment. "Systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department ... resulted in a special mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place," said the unclassified version of the report.[198] It also blamed too much reliance on local militias who failed to fend off the attackers that evening.[199] The Council on Foreign Relations in an initial report saw it as a refutation to the notion that the Obama administration delayed its response.[200] However, it confirmed that contrary to initial accounts, there was no protest outside the consulate. It placed responsibility for the incident solely upon the attackers, deemed as terrorists.[13]